daniel comer comments one and two

1
i somewhat agree with katherine when she says "I think that since Mr. Hyde broke the law Mr. Utterson has the right to break the law as well." Ian believes that this is very open-ended which it is; but if you think about it it can be justified as well. i think that if you are put in the situation where you're family is killed you might just want revenge....in which case would be breaking the law. another subject of this is the dealth penalty. i dont believe it should be around but as long as it is the arguement can be made that killing will get you killed, which is shown to be legal..but ethics and morales will be challenged no matter what.
2
my views tend to be a little mixed as i also concur with ian. he makes a good point. the law is the law and you have to obey it...even though what you think is right isnt always what is legal. morales are morales but jail time for an easy case shouldnt be a problem. give him the will and leave it alone for now.