Katherine Marting Comments 1 and 2

1. In Megan’s post she discussed how Mr. Utterson has to deal with choosing between a friend and the law. I think that since Mr. Hyde broke the law Mr. Utterson has the right to break the law as well. Therefore in the situation Megan has brought up I feel Mr. Utterson has no choice but to break the law so that his friend benefits and Mr. Hyde gets nothing.
2. Ian’s post says that Mr. Hyde should get the inheritance since that is what it says on the will. I strongly disagree because sometimes people need to break rules to better the outcome to the problem. Ian’s solution would only make Mr. Hyde a worse person since he would now be filled with money and possessions that he knows he doesn’t deserve.