1. In Rebecca’s post I agree and disagree. She was correct when making the observation of Lanyon being such good friends with Jekyll. Therefore Lanyon had no choice but to follow the instructions of his beloved friend. But when Rebecca mentions that Lanyon’s decision was irrational, I disagree. At that moment he was sure that through this current journey he had to other choice than to watch and see the outcome, it is pure human nature, which is rational.
2. Stephanie’s post is very truthful. In many of the posts I read people discussed how he was irrational or rational. But either way he mad a decision that ended up costing him his life. Whether Lanyon would have found out anyway that Hyde was Jekyll it might of just as well cost him his life too. But the point is Lanyon stuck with his decision from the start, to help his best friend and in the end fulfill his curiosity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment